Samsung Exynos 2400 Benchmarks: 3D Mark Wild Life Leaks Show On Par with A17 Bionic

samsung exynos 2400 vs a17 bionic benchmark

Samsung’s latest chipset, the Exynos 2400, is making waves in the tech industry with its impressive performance in the 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test. And for the first time, may be, just may be exynos will be a better variant?. I don’t know, will see about that later.

Source: Nguyen Phi Hung

The Exynos 2400 managed an average framerate of 24FPS in 3DMark’s Wild Life Extreme results. These scores were posted by Nguyen Phi Hung, showcasing how far Samsung has come with its newly launched Exynos 24001. The SoC scored 4,042 points in the benchmark, with Nguyen stating that these results were twice as fast as what was achieved by the Exynos 2200, Samsung’s previous-generation chipset.

Exynos 2400 Benchmark vs Snapdragon 8 Gen3

Source: @faridofanani96

In a recent performance comparison, the Exynos variant demonstrated superior performance sustainability compared to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. The test, which was similar to 3DMark’s Wild Life Extreme, pushed these smartphone chipsets to their limits with a variety of CPU and GPU-focused tasks. The Exynos 2400 managed to maintain 64.6% of its original performance, while the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 dropped to 48.3%.

Interestingly, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 was tested on the high-end Galaxy S24 Ultra, rumored to have a significantly larger vapor chamber than its predecessor. Despite this, the Exynos variant still outperformed it. The Exynos 2400 had previously impressed in the 3DMark’s Wild Life Extreme Stress Test, achieving double the score of the Exynos 2200 and matching the performance of Apple’s A17 Pro.

The cooling solution of the Galaxy S24 Plus played a crucial role in managing the Exynos 2400’s temperature. However, Samsung’s use of Fan-out Wafer Level Packaging technology (FOWLP) likely contributed to the new SoC’s heat resistance, enhancing multi-core performance and leading to improved results.

The Exynos 2400 has shown promising results in two 3DMark benchmarks so far. While these results are encouraging, further testing is needed to fully evaluate the capabilities of Samsung’s new silicon.

Exynos 2400 Benchmark vs Apple A17 Bionic

What’s even more impressive is that the Exynos 2400’s performance is on par with Apple’s A17 Pro. This is a significant achievement for Samsung, as it shows that the company is capable of competing with industry leaders in terms of chipset performance.

There are two main reasons why the Exynos 2400 performed so well. First, Samsung’s entire Galaxy S24 series is equipped with a vapor chamber, which makes it easier to manage the temperatures of the Exynos 2400. By contrast, Apple has not used a vapor chamber or any other form of elaborate cooling on the iPhone 15 Pro and iPhone 15 Pro Max.

Secondly, the new Exynos is mass-produced on Samsung’s 4LPP+ process. While this might be inferior compared to TSMC’s N4P node, it has improved power efficiency compared to the earlier iteration, leading to better results.

While these results are promising, it’s important to remember that this is not the only benchmark that will be used to monitor the Exynos 2400’s performance. As always, I will provide updated results as soon as I receive updates, so stay tuned.

samsung exynos 2400 vs a17 bionic benchmark
A17 Bionic vs other contenders

To read about other Exynos articles done by me, click here.

Source: @negativeonehero